Book Review: The Stand by Stephen King


Rating:  ★★1/2

“In America even scummy douchebags like you should be able to catch a cold.”

M-O-O-N, that spells unpopular opinion. I do have oh so many of those. Laws, yes.

I don’t want to write this review. Really I don’t. I don’t want to say that this is far and away my least favorite King book ever. I don’t want to tell you that the Satan versus God war was total bullshit, or that King does much better when he writes general Good Vs. Evil stories.

I don’t want to tell you that Randall Flagg is totally lame. That Brady Hartsfield would bend Flagg over his knee and give him a fucking spanking and send him off to his room without supper.

“To be polite, she sipped a little more of the dreadful Kool-Aid.”

But I have to say these things you see, because The Stand is 1,400 pages of boredom. I did not drink the dreadful Kool-Aid.

I have been thinking long and hard about this. Pretty much ever since the book started. (That was on April 15. Laws, yes, almost two weeks ago.) And I can’t precisely articulate what exactly it is that I find so boring about it.

“That was the whole world, after all, nothing but thoughts and plots.”

Maybe because so much time was spent on the opening, on the beginning of the flu. Was the flu horrifying? Yeah, in a “Oh God what if this happened for real?” sort of way… Could King have done more with it? Why, Laws yes, I think he could have. I would have liked to see the panic overtake the cities, the mass exodus, the cars crashing, the people stomping each other into the dirt and turning ugly in a fight for survival, the panic power of a single sneeze in a crowded room.

King, your Constant Reader knows you are capable of this. Instead I was given passing references to the military blocking off roads and shooting people down, a code name for a super secret evil government plan that didn’t seem like it ever manifested. It was all hinted at. I don’t like you when you’re subtle Steve. I much prefer when you take all the ugly people are capable of and slap me across the face with it. That’s just the kind of girl I am. Maybe I’ve got a little R.F. on my shoulder.

“But no one knows how long five minutes is in the dark; it might be fair to say that, in the dark, five minutes does not exist.”

But that’s not all. I was more than a little annoyed at the hints of brilliance, being reminded of what was to come. I saw the beginnings of Cujo in there, The Kid trapped in a hot car surrounded by evil wolves. I might have glimpsed pieces of Dreamcatcher. The beginnings of Under the Dome, little ideas sprinkled all around.  All these quotes I’ve included?  I highlighted 30 others, and will cherish them all.  But a 1,400 page book has to be more than a string of good quotes.  Maybe it’s a matter of not aging well, I don’t know. Might I have liked this if I had read it 30 years ago, when it was first released? Yeah, maybe. As it stands, I was disappointed, and maybe that isn’t fair, but it is what it is.

All my favorite things about King’s work are there. The characters being real people, average Joes and Janes. The underdogs. The minute details, the Baby, Can You Dig Your Man’s? The pure nostalgia of his work. And somehow they didn’t come together in a way that made me love any of it. Did I love Glen? Sure. Nick? Sure. Tom Cullen? Yes. Kojak? You can bet on it. But Larry, Stu, Ralph, Joe, Lucy, Abagail? I really didn’t care. They were, to quote the book, No Great Loss.

“The flu didn’t just leave survivor types, why the hell should it?”

I think my problem, in the end, was the distance between the good and the evil here. There’s something wildly impersonal about this story. Randall Flagg wants to be evil just for the sake of being evil. Brady Hartsfield is the same, but he’s not afraid to do his own dirty work. In fact, he wouldn’t have it any other way. Mind-fucking people into being bad for you just doesn’t carry the same weight as Brady throttling a car into a crowd of people in need, just because he can. Just because he wants the world to suffer with him.

There were some high points. That chapter that glimpses the second wave? The non-survivor types the world left behind? Absolute gold. As far as I’m concerned, it was the best chapter in the book. That, was what I wanted more of. If we’re going to use third person omnipotent, we should be using it for exactly this. The Kid? From what I understand, he wasn’t in the original, which baffles me, because he too, was one of the highlights. Like a Junior Rennie with his brain fully intact.

“That was an act of pure human fuckery.”

There were consistency/continuity errors. The ending was hugely unsatisfying. Many character ARCs are never given legitimate conclusions.  I now understand why people thought King couldn’t write women.  At one point Stu offers to get Frannie a washing machine.  A washing machine, for when the electricity comes back on so she won’t have to break her back doing all the laundry.  And what does she do?  She throws her arms around him and kisses him.  Uh-uh.  Not in my house Stu Redman.  You better get yourself a goddamn washing machine or you better find a fucking time machine and travel back to 1958.

Beyond all that, it was incredibly messy for a King book.  There were the bizarre alternating timelines spliced into the middle, sudden in their appearance and just as sudden in their disappearance.

“After all, the only practical compensation for having a nightmare is waking up and realizing it was all just a dream.”

The foreshadowing and the supernatural didn’t jive with the ending we were given. Minor spoiler: at first it seems like the people who are immune to the flu are the ones who dream, and people who aren’t regular dreamers, die.  Kojak, one of the world’s only surviving dogs, is a dreamer.  Later, it’s explained that children who are the product of two immune parents are also immune.  Well which of these is the determining survivor factor, genetics or dreams?  I’ll accept either answer but I won’t accept both.  Either the dreams make them safe or they don’t.  If it’s not the dreams, those shouldn’t have been happening until after the plague had done its work.  If it’s genetics, then in theory wouldn’t any survivors also have to have surviving family members?  The whole premise fell apart because the book couldn’t decide if it wanted to be fantasy or science fiction.

I just can’t express it any clearer than to say I was disappointed. When society caves in on itself, and King writes books about it, I expect the worst of his characters. I expect there to be Johnny-do-good types with questionable pasts. I expect there to be charming, cunning, wolves in sheep’s clothing, who mostly win, until they don’t. Instead I got a world full of mostly decent people who do bad things with one oddly levitating demon pulling their strings.

“‘The Lord is my shepherd,” he recited softly. “I shall not want for nothing. He makes me lie down in the green pastures. He greases up my head with oil. He gives me kung-fu in the face of my enemies. Amen.'”

God bless Tom Cullen, Laws yes.  That’s all I have to say about that.

In case you don’t trust me (why the hell should you? wtf do I know?) The Stand can be found on GoodReads here, and Amazon here.


28 thoughts on “Book Review: The Stand by Stephen King

  1. This is why I don’t reread books. I read The Stand back in high school? I think. And loved it. And I’m quite sure I wouldn’t have the patience to get through it today. I want to keep my happy memories! Also, it sounds like you read the “expanded” edition, which is about 400 pages longer than the original😬

    Liked by 1 person

    • I did read the expanded edition and I wish I hadn’t. I don’t know if I would have liked it more or not, but it might have helped. In all fairness, many people love this book and it might just have been me.

      What I liked about Under the Dome was the tension you get from knowing what’s going on and what will happen before the heroes do.. and here that wasn’t really happening. It did happen a little with Harold, I just wanted more of that plotting/scheming from our villains. Flagg was just like: I’m going to blow everyone up! Why? Why not! and some of the excitement was lost for me. Like what was even his plan in the end?

      To make it worse, I was expecting Sin City to be this place of wild debauchery, drugs, sex, and violence, and instead everyone was just good little worker bees doing as The Walkin’ Man says. Does that make sense?


    • I think I was holding out hope that it was going to get better, and culminate in some massive war between the two cities. If it had been anyone but King I would have DNF’d.

      But I can see why some people loved it. I think there’s just been so much released since this that it was hard to see past everything that came after.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I loved this. In all fairness I listened to the audio book. I find I enjoy King more via audio books.

    My favourite memorable moment was when Tom found out Nick died.

    ‘When we get to heaven, maybe Nick van talk and Tum Cullen will be able to think’.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Is it weird that for me, someone who has yet to read any Stephen King book, this review makes me wanna read him even more? I feel like since you’re so vocal about how boring this is, that sets up the contrast of his other books being much better.
    Speaking of, what would you say of a horror-beginner like me starting up with Bazaar of Bad Dreams? Bad idea? Decent idea? I have it somewhat high on the TBR.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I have a weird relationship with Stephen King- while I’m reading his books I’m always inwardly groaning at the dialogue and incessant descriptions. And the repetitiveness. Then I get to the end and think, “Wow that was a pretty cool story!” I always enjoy them a lot more once I’m done reading them.

    I read the extended version of this and honestly thought I’d be reading it for the rest of my life at one point. I liked it, but so many times I wanted to scream at Stephen King to just get to the bloody point.

    Liked by 1 person

    • 😂😂 That’s too funny! I actually adore all those things about King’s writing, but I can see where others wouldn’t. Story telling is definitely his strong suit. You should try some of his short story collections- I bet you’d like them. They tell a good story minus all the description.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I’ve actually been on a bit of a Stephen King kick lately, I just read 3 of the Gunslinger books and have a few audio books on reserve at the library. I have to say, I enjoy his books more on audio than I did in print.

    Have you read anything by Joe Hill? Now his books I adore.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I thought- at first, it was a matter of not aging well. But I’ve since been corrected that some other readers did not like it any more than I did when it first released.

      My two cents is that he’s gotten better as he’s gotten older and it’s hard to go back when you’ve already read his newer stuff. I know there are many out there who disagree with that sentiment also though. *shrugs*


  6. Pingback: Month in Review: April 2019 | Hamlets & Hyperspace

  7. Pingback: Top Ten Tuesday: Summer TBR 2019 | Hamlets & Hyperspace

  8. Pingback: 2019 Mid-Year Book Freak Out Tag | Hamlets & Hyperspace

  9. Pingback: Year in Review: 2019 Wrap Up | Hamlets & Hyperspace

  10. Pingback: Favorite SciFi Sub-genres | Hamlets & Hyperspace

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s