As a follow up to yesterday’s discussion post, it only seems fitting that I follow it up with my three DNF reviews. I’ve decided not to rate these, because although I know why I’m not finishing, I don’t want to say I’d recommend or not recommend them, not knowing how they end.
I was so excited for this book when I first heard about it. It seemed like a dystopian novel with some fantastical elements (ESP) and a bunch of dreamers for characters.
What it actually is, is contemporary literature. This is not my thing. If I had realized that’s what it was I would have NOPED it right away.
I made it to page 140 before I decided I didn’t want to continue. In that time, we read three chapters, so that was strike number one. Chapter one is 72 pages long. That’s not a chapter. It’s a novelette.
In that time I actually did grow to like Leif and Matthew, who I originally thought were the two main characters in the book. If the book had continued to keep Matthew as the POV character, I actually might have continued. Unfortunately, it jumped POVs to a character named Chris, who at that point, was one of the least interesting characters. Chapter three switched POVs again to a character named Elspeth. Chapter four, the point at which I decided I had no desire to continue, saw yet another shift in POV, to Julia. Whose presence in the novel at all is questionable, nevermind the utter lack of necessity to give her a POV. The POV shifts were strike number two.
And the final nail in the coffin was the world building, or lack thereof. These characters seem to be protesting something, belonging to a wider movement called Occupy.
I have no idea what the hell they were protesting.
Their smaller group within the larger group, whose name I can’t recall (but whose initials are something ridiculous like RFTGFP) believes that people should strive to perceive other people’s feelings. Leif is really good at it. He can sense your email password. Chris cannot do it, but believes in it and believes that it’s the most important thing ever. Or something.
I just didn’t get it. I mean- yeah I get the larger message, we’d all be better people if we stopped to put ourselves in other people’s shoes once in awhile, but I don’t know why or how the government fits into it. There’s some talk of Homeland Security, and tapping phones and monitoring computers… but no indication that any of it was done prior to the group hacking someone’s email. The whole premise is bizarre, and seems overly complicated while also being too simple, and ultimately just not what I wanted.
Just a note on the writing- the author appears to be some kind of literary journalist, so he uses a lot of obscure words and fancy language that feels superficial at best because he didn’t give us a lot of insight into what the characters were actually feeling. I consistently felt like I was missing some of the context.
Anyway- this is probably going to be a wonderful book for someone, just not me.
This book has the misfortune of being one more science fiction horror novel in a long list of science fiction horror novels I’ve read this year. I’ve read at least two other books (and one novella) this year that, simply put, did it better.
This was a buddy read, which is usually sufficient reason for me to push through (no person left behind!), but my two fabulous buddies finished it in a couple of days while I was still hanging out on page 94. At which point they advised me it did not get better and they’d forgive me for DNFing.
I happily took their advice.
I don’t have any specific complaints except that this felt more like a set up to a bad romance than there was any actual horror being included and I was extremely bored.
The setting was cool. But I saw almost this exact setting done in The Last Astronaut by David Wellington and Walking to Aldebaran by Adrian Tchaikovsky, both of which were far more atmospheric than The Luminous Dead (not to mention less time consuming).
It’s a shame because I think it could have been good if it had been a novella, or if it had booted the romance and pitted our two MCs against each other as hero and villain.
This is the one I feel guiltiest about, because I don’t even think there is anything particularly wrong with it, except that we are just not jiving right now.
I attempted to read the introduction three times before I decided it was way too dry and skipped to the beginning. In the beginning, we meet two heroes, Skyfury Guo and Ironheart Yang, that feel earnest in their desire to be heroes, but also a little like SpongeBob and Patrick in their competence.
I hate saying that- because I know this is a cherished piece of literature in China, but the whole thing just felt a little cartoonish.
The part that I read was technically all backstory for the hero: what happened in the months leading up to his birth. I might have continued if the introduction were dropped and the back story was reduced to 10-15 pages. (If we’re looking at the blurb: “Guo Jing, son of a murdered Song patriot” this is as far as I got in the book, the murdered Song patriot.) If the pacing is this slow, 15% of the book is back story, I just don’t want to continue.
The action scenes weren’t very exciting to me. I read once, that the difference between a good action scene and a bad one, is that a bad one will only describe what is happening. Good action scenes will describe how a character feels when they are in the action. This is a case where the movements are described adequately, but entirely without feeling.
I had a hard time envisioning the setting and the characters. The villains, from what I read, seemed like they weren’t going to be very fleshed out at any point in time. Just hooded figures, evil magistrates, maybe a shadowy emperor or something. It’s a dated method of story telling. Understandable, since it was originally written in 1957, but also something I don’t want to read right now.
I might come back to this at some point, knowing what I know and skipping the back story because the premise does sound very exciting (Genghis Khan!) but it’s not going to be any time soon and I don’t want to leave the book unreviewed on NetGalley. I attempted it. I made it through 70 dense pages or so.
Have you read any of these? What did you think?