Rating: ★★★1/2
I enjoyed most of this humongous book a lot more than I normally enjoy what I would rate as a three star read- so I gave it an extra half star. I don’t know if I’ve ever said this before- I think I have my ratings broken down on my about me page, but for me: three stars is what I think of as “safe to skip”. 1 or 2 stars is a recommendation to avoid and 4 and 5 stars is recommended to read. I wouldn’t necessarily recommend skipping Imaginary Friend, especially if you were looking forward to it, but I was a little disappointed with this.
I want to start by saying the first 60% or so is really pretty good. I loved the picture we were painted of Christopher and Kate Reese and their lives together. I loved how we got to know the town and all the little folks populating it. It actually reminded me a lot of one of my favorite authors, Stephen King, in that way.
Here’s another way it reminded me of one specific book by King, what started out feeling like Under the Dome with a less evil villain, ended up feeling like The Stand with a scarier villain than Randall Flagg and a whole lot more confusion. There’s a heavy dose of religion and Catholic guilt in this book, and it frustrated me, because I wasn’t prepared for it to be included. As someone who doesn’t identify with any particular religion, it just isn’t my favorite way to present a classic good vs. evil story.
I was around the 500 page mark or so, thinking the ending was coming soon, wondering what in the heck was populating those last 200 pages. Well. The end. The climax. The climax is 200 pages long.
It was confusing and it bounced around a lot (multiple POVs) and at times I wasn’t sure if the characters were actually experiencing the events of the book or if it was all in their imagination. I was frustrated with my inability to pay attention to the events, distracted by the amounts of symbolism and questioning the meaning of the whole story. It just wasn’t what I want in horror. I think that’s why the term “literary horror” is one we don’t often see.
The author uses baby teeth as a recurring theme, and while it’s probably the ultimate symbol for childhood lost, or adulthood gained, I wasn’t sure it was entirely necessary, and it felt like an odd choice. I mean, who really describes a tree house ladder as looking like baby teeth? I do think there were some other interesting events that were meant to be metaphoric, that provided plenty of food for thought, but I won’t spoil them here.
I did like the pacing. It’s 700 pages but most chapters were only a couple pages long. This is 100% my favorite way to structure a book. It makes me feel accomplished because I’m reading so “fast” and it’s easy to pick up and put down. I realize this is a silly thing to get hung up on, but I just find reading a book like that much more satisfying.
On another positive note, there was no way I ever would have guessed the ending, so be wary of spoilers as you read reviews for this one. The book does reference some child death’s, though I don’t recall any of them being too graphic, just a heads up for people who are sensitive to that.
Overall this is a long book that reads quickly and would make for good, creepy October read.
Imaginary Friend releases on October 1, 2019 and can be found on GoodReads or preordered on Amazon. Thank you to the publisher for providing an ARC for review.
Wow.. when I first heard this was publishing I didn’t bother looking at a synopsis because I figured I would get around to it eventually. I had no idea it was 700 pages and that it was a horror novel. I think I’m going to bump this down the TBR since I will not have time to get to it in the next couple of month.
Great review as always!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well I’m glad I was able to help out in that regard! I have a weird tendency to always check page counts so I can mentally track how long it might take me to read something and where and when I’ll be able to fit it in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too! Like, do I have enough time to finish this chapter or no? HAha 😛
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice review! I agree that short chapters, especially in large books, makes you feel super accomplished and that you’re reading fast.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wish more books were structured that way lol. I’m currently reading a book that’s only 300 pages but the chapters are really long so it feels like it’s going slow.
LikeLike
Yours is actually the first review I’ve read! I almost requested this but when I saw it was 700 pages I just couldn’t. Now I’m torn. I do love horror and but I’m not sure about the confusion you mentioned. But I also love short chapters! I think they make the pacing better. Awesome review, Sarah!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah it doesn’t feel like a 700 page novel. Some chapters are really 2 pages.
The confusion was just regarding there being a lot of fantastical things happening all at once all over the town, so it was sometimes hard to know- is this the real world? Or is this imaginary?
I think if it interests you it’s still worth checking out. I think the beginning of the book was actually a lot of fun.
LikeLike
I will for sure. Now I just need to stop time so I can read everything I want to!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I WISH!
LikeLike
I saw another review similar to yours. Just middling… I like the premise the blurb promises, but not enough to take a chance on 700 pages.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad I’m not alone at least? I’ve been worried I was being too harsh on it… and that maybe ultimately it just wasn’t for me… everything was good about it until the last third or so.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The premise is great, when I saw the book I thought it sounded awesome and even did a Waiting on Wednesday post for it as I was excited for it. But…your middling review for the book, others too and it is 700 pages, dunno if I’ll bother with it now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know- I was excited for it too, and I will say the book isn’t not worthwhile… the beginning absolutely lived up to the hype for me, I just felt like the climax took way too long. A climax is supposed to be pretty quick- not 200 pages long. You know what I mean? I feel like he could have accomplished the same thing in 500 or so pages.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve glanced at the cover for this before, and assumed it was a Stephen King novel. It just looks like one. Based on your review of it, it sounds just as creepy as one…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah- it’s right up there with King. Actually it felt a lot like King early on.
LikeLike
I don’t mind a bit of a drawn out ending in average-length books … but when the book is 700 pages and the last 200 are the ending? Noooo, I’m out 🙈
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol. Right?! I feel so weird complaining that all the action went on too long but it was just a little too much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah no. Not my kinda thing. And even if it was, I don’t think I would have read it after reading your review. You have convinced me that it’s gonna be a suck fest because multiple POVs can get really tricky and sometimes even the best of the best fail to get it right! And I agree that horror is a genre which thrives on spooky ambiance and plot. It…” literary horror” is just…it won’t be…idk!
I am glad that at least ending proved it worth your time, though!
LOVED YOUR REVIEW! ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha- thank you! I’m glad I could save you 700 pages of trouble!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mmmm… A 200 pages ending sounds both bloated and frustrating, and the excessive use of symbolism does not encourage me to rush in discovering this novel, which is a pity because your comparison with Kings’ The Stand was quite intriguing…
Thanks for sharing! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually didn’t like The Stand- so if that comparison intrigues you this might be a better fit for you than it was for me!
I will say the similarity is more in themes than actual events and characters. If that helps.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s interesting, indeed. I have come to consider The Stand something of a “model” work for post-apocalyptic scenarios, especially when they entail a pandemic, but as it happens with all books, no two readers see it in the same way – which is the most interesting part of sharing ideas between bloggers 🙂
I will keep this one on my “maybe” list….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yeah, it’s not like that at all!
I was thinking more about the themes, the good vs evil, the stand off between the two groups, the side dose of religion… if that makes sense?
This is not post apocalyptic and there is no pandemic. In fact I think very few characters actually died.. but just the overall concepts are similar.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wanted to try this out too but thought it would be best if I stayed away from it for the time being and wait till others had tried it out. Here you are, the first person I know who read and reviewed it and I think it’s definitely one I can safely skip for now, and not only because of its length. Wish the climax wasn’t.. the ending too. Great honest review, Sarah! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you! It’s too bad because I think it had the potential to be great, just the ending was really messy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This looks way different from his other books, and Halloween is coming up so I might pick it up! If I don’t though, I won’t be too heartbroken (that’s a lie, I get heartbroken every time I can’t read a book because most of them deserve love).
Thank you for the spoiler warning!
– Emma 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is way different from his other stuff (at least from what I understand of it.) definitely don’t be too heart broken if you skip it, you aren’t missing much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aye, skipping this one two even if I have enjoyed wallflower. This doesn’t sound like it be worth me effect and the last 200 pages would likely irk me. More saved time. Arrrr!
x The Captain
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is nothing like Perks so totally safe to skip! It’s a shame it took him 20 years to get another book out, and then it seems like a dud. At least to me. I’m sure other readers will enjoy it? Maybe?
LikeLike
Pingback: Month in Review: September 2019 | Hamlets & Hyperspace
Pingback: Book Review: Follow Me To Ground by Sue Rainsford | Hamlets & Hyperspace